Message

In my previous email, I had not included the proposed update to the definitions, which I have included below.

-----Original Message-----
From: Friedenthal, Sanford
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 5:44 PM
To: 'doliver106'
Cc: Phil Spiby; Ian Bailey; Michael Dickerson; Alan Moore; Dwayne Hardy; Erik Herzog; Harald Eisenmann; Harold P Frisch; James A U'Ren; James D. Baker; Joseph Skipper; Julian Johnson; Peter Denno; Regina Gonzales; Rick Steiner; Roger Burkhart; Stan Hendryx; Cris Kobryn; Friedenthal, Sanford; Tom Thurman
Subject: Issues With SE Concept model draft 8

The Draft 8 of the SE Conceptual Model dated Oct 09, 2002 continues to improve as it evolves. As we have all agreed, this model is critical to the success of the SE DSIG and AP-233 efforts, and the model facilitates the syncronization between them. In particular, this model will be used as a primary input to the development of the SE UML requirements, which we will reviiew at the November SE DSIG meeting in DC.

I have identified a set of issues below with Draft 8 of the SE Conceptual Model. Please consider these issues during the next review in Korea and iteration of the model. I am hoping they will be addressed prior to the November SE DISG meeting.

Also, thanks for incoroprating several comments from my August 13 proposed update to the SE Concept Model Draft 6. The proposed update also included a set of definitions in response to an action item from the concept model review at the INCOSE Symposium in July. As we discussed, I do not believe you had the opportunity to review these definitions previously, so I am reatttaching them for the teams considration. They include the proposed definition, along with the definition that was in Draft 6, so a side by side comparison can readily be made.

Sanford Friedenthal
OMG SE DSIG Chair
Lockheed Martin Corporation
sanford.friedenthal@lmco.com
(703) 293-5557

-----Original Message-----
From: doliver106 [mailto:doliver106@cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:05 PM
To: Michael Dickerson; Alan Moore; Dwayne Hardy; Erik Herzog; Harald Eisenmann; Harold P Frisch; James A U'Ren; James D. Baker; Joseph Skipper; Julian Johnson; Peter Denno; Regina Gonzales; Rick Steiner; Roger Burkhart; Stan Hendryx; Cris Kobryn; Sandy Friedenthal; Tom Thurman
Cc: Phil Spiby; Ian Bailey
Subject: Concept model draft 8

These files are sent to you directly. They are not uploaded to BSCW yet because my memory allocation is exceeded. I will get recommendations on tomorrows conference call on the best way to resolve the memory problem.

JD, if anyone new wishes to participate in issue identification and resolution, they need to work from the draft 8 10/9/02 versions. they should read both the dictionary and the concept model.

The sections on structure and properties have additions from Julian and from your charts on AP210. Only a few of the AP210 concepts were included to keep this model as simple as possible. Desperately need corrections from you both to make these parts correct and coherent.

The section on time was revised in draft 7. The sections on verification and validation first appeared in Draft 7. We have received no issues on these parts. This cannot possibly be because they are correct as drafted. They need your insights and issues.

Please use the issue log format in submitting issue. this allows us to append new issue to the ones collected to date without interpreting and rewriting the author's issue.