'email@example.com'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'Terry.Robar@motorola.com'; Barker, Thomas; 'email@example.com'
Subject:OMG SE DSIG Status Update
Information (June 24-28)
SE DSIG participants,
early registration. General OMG Meeting information is included below.
links to work products, which will be reviewed and discussed at the
meeting, are available on
the SE DSIG website at http://syseng.omg.org
sure to refresh your webpage or you will not get the updated info).
Please let me know by June 4 at the latest, whether you plan to
attend. I am also considering providing telecon dial-in information
for selected participants, but only as the exception. Let me know if
you desire this option.
The following is a brief
update as of
activities. Status updates
are included on the
http://syseng.omg.org under "work in progress".
· The SE Conceptual Model Team, led by Dave Oliver, has prepared a
draft update of the SE conceptual model. The initial baseline SE
Conceptual model was presented by Julian Johnson at the Anaheim OMG SE
DSIG meeting in January, and
is available under the
minutes. This high level view is intended to reflect some of the core
SE concepts from the previous SEDRES information model (predecessor to
AP-233 ISO effort). Dave presented his proposed updates to this model
at the AP-233 review last week (May 24). The proposed update is
available for review on the
information (thanks to JD Baker for capturing this in a UML modeling
tool). Please bring your comments to the meeting to support the
walkthrough of this model.
· The SE UML Prototyping Team, led by Rick Steiner, has taken some of
the key concepts from the SE Conceptual model, and developed a matrix which reflects different approaches for representing the concepts in UML. Rick plans to walk through the different approaches reflected in the matrix at the SE DSIG meeting. The preliminary matrix will be posted to the SE DSIG website under the Orlando meeting information.
· We expect to receive at least 7 responses to the UML for SE RFI by
tomorrow May 31. Responses
include inputs from
Volvo, Mitre, INCOSE OOSEM WG, and Lockheed Martin as a miniumum.
Responders are encouraged to present a summary of their response at
the Orlando SE DSIG meeting (Please contact me if you wish to
present). Responses to be discussed at the September meeting, are due
DSIG website or direclty at:
· Sandy and Roger drafted the preliminary UML for SE requirements
analysis based on the available inputs, including the initial baseline
SE conceptual model, previous UML V2.0 RFI inputs for SE, and other
reference papers. The requirements analysis draft will be reviewed at
the June meeting in
additional inputs are made available, including updates to the
conceptual model, RFI inputs, and results from the UML prototyping
team. The evolving document is being made available to the V2.0
Submission teams, to begin to evaluate the extent to which the
submissions address SE concerns, and to initiate a dialogue with the
teams. The UML for SE requirements analysis is available off the SE
DSIG website, or directly at:
· LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU AT THE SEDSIG MEETING.
OMG SE DSIG Chair
Lockheed Martin Corporation
OMG Technical Meeting Information (June 24-28), in
(included in original)